|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Legal Love endorses Hillary Clinton for President
By Senator Hillary Clinton
As I have traveled around the country these past twelve months, what I sensed in my heart has been confirmed – America is embracing its LGBT sons and daughters with an acceptance and understanding as never before. On the campaign trail, a father of a gay son will ask about ending Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. A woman will ask why she can be discriminated against just because of who she is. Sometimes they wait furtively for the crowd to thin and then whisper their confidences in a soft voice and sometimes they stand up proudly at town meetings and want me to share my views on how I will help lead the change to assure that this country fulfills its promise to everyone.
Let me tell you what I have been telling voters across America. I am fully committed to the fair and equal treatment of LGBT Americans. For seven long years, the Bush Administration has tried to divide us - only seeing people who matter to them. It's been a government of the few, by the few, and for the few. And no community has been more invisible to this administration than the LGBT community.
I will change that. The best evidence of what I will do as President is what I have already done.
I am proud of my record as First Lady, as a U.S. Senator and as a candidate for President in working toward the fair and equal treatment of LGBT Americans.
· I am proud that as Chair of the Senate Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee in 2006, I worked closely with LBGT community to develop a smart strategy that defeated the Federal Marriage Amendment. I am proud of fighting the FMA as divisive wedge politics at its worst.
· I am proud to be a co-sponsor of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, the Matthew Shepard Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act, and the Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligation Act which would grant the same benefits (including health insurance) to domestic partners of federal employees that are currently offered to employees’ legal spouses.
· I am proud to have authored the Early Treatment for HIV Act, which expands access to vital treatment options for low-income individuals living with HIV, and fought to fully fund the Ryan White CARE Act.
· I am proud that I hired a National Director of LGBT Outreach within a month of announcing my candidacy for President and to have openly gay and lesbian staffers serving at all levels of my campaign.
· I am proud to have a National LGBT Steering Committee of over 130 that includes openly LGBT elected officials, Board members and opinion leaders on issues ranging from transgender rights, to HIV/AIDS, to “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”.
· I am proud to have marched in Gay Pride parades as both First Lady and as Senator and to have spoken in front of so many LGBT audiences ranging from the Human Rights Campaign, Empire State Pride Agenda, the Hetrick Martin Institute, PFLAG (Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays), GMHC (Gay Men’s Health Crisis), and the American Foundation for AIDS Research.
· I am proud to have fought Republican efforts to demonize and marginalize the LGBT community, and I will continue to do that as President.
We have so much work to do. When I am President, we will work together to make sure that all Americans in committed relationships have equal benefits and that nothing stands in the way of loving couples who want to adopt children in need. We're going to expand our federal hate crimes legislation and pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and assure that they are both fully inclusive of sexual orientation and gender identity. And finally, we will put an end to the failed policy of Don't Ask, Don't Tell. Courage, honor, patriotism and sacrifice – the traits that define our men and women in uniform – have nothing to do with sexual orientation.
My father was a conservative Republican, who held very traditional views for much of his life. Yet in his last years, it was a gay couple who lived next door who provided much of the compassion and comfort he and my mother needed as he grew ill. And it was that same neighbor who held his hand as he died. If my father can move, America can move.
To each and every LGBT American, I say this. You have done so much to help this country understand your lives by simply being open and honest about who you are and living your lives with dignity. Thank you for your courage. It is time that we recognize your hard work. I know that this country is ready for changes in the law that reflect the evolution in our hearts.
America deserves a President who appeals to the best in each of us, not the worst; a President who values and respects all Americans and treats all Americans equally no matter who they are or who they love. I want to be that President. I want to be your President.
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My Letter to Senate President Therese Murray
|
| |
Dear Senate President Murray,
I am urging you to kill the vote
on the same-sex marriage amendment on June 14th. I am urging you to
kill it for good, and not just postpone it. This issue has taken over
my life for the past four years. I have been with my boyfriend/fiance
for nearly 5 years and we are planning on getting married in the
future. I do not want to feel forced by the state to get married before
next November, before citizens may get the opportunity to vote on my
future.
It is unfair, unequal and improper to move this amendment
forward. The legislature did not vote on the health-care initiative in
January, and they do not need to vote on my rights on Thursday. You
have the power to make this move. Regardless about what you have said
about vowing to hold a vote, I would hope you would have the courage
and honor which your position holds and put an end to this issue on
June 14th.
Do you want to be remembered as someone who stood up for
equality and stood up for upholding the Massachusetts' Constitution, or
somehow who allowed discrimination and hatred to overtake the state?
The power really is in your hands, please do not let the people down. I
am urging you again, please procedurally kill the amendment. You will
be celebrated for it in many ways.
Sincerely,
Matthew P.
Senate President Murray has the power to put this issue to rest for good. Encourage her to make the right decision. Her contact information is:
Senate President Therese Murray
State House
Room 330
Boston, MA 02133
Tel: (617) 722-1500
FAX: (617) 248-3840
District Office
Building Three, Room 319
Cordage Park
Plymouth, MA 02360
Tel: (508) 746-9332
Therese.Murray@state.ma.us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murray vows vote on gay marriage
|
| |
Murray vows vote on gay marriage
Senate president looks to defeat ban
By Frank Phillips, Globe Staff | March 23, 2007
Senate President Therese Murray, who supported an effort last fall to
kill a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage without a vote, said
yesterday that she will use her power as the new leader of the Senate
and of the Constitutional Convention to ensure that lawmakers take an
up-or-down vote on the amendment.
Murray, a strong supporter of same-sex unions, said she will continue
to help round up votes to defeat the marriage ban but will oppose any
move to bury the proposed amendment with parliamentary tactics.
"My vote is going to be just what it was the last time, but I am not
going to move to adjourn," Murray said, speaking with reporters on her
way into a Senate session a day after she was elected to succeed Robert
E. Travaglini as Senate leader. "I will call for a vote, and I will try
to help the advocates get the votes that they need. . . . I think it's
important that we vote."
Murray's statement stands in sharp contrast to the vote she took at a
Constitutional Convention in November, when she backed a recess motion
designed to kill the proposal by keeping it from moving to the
2007-2008 legislative session for a final vote.
Two months later, in the waning moments of the legislative session, the
amendment crossed its first hurdle when it won the support of 62
representatives and senators, 12 more than required for approval, after
Travaglini, an opponent of same-sex marriage, steered the measure to a
quick vote.
The Legislature's next Constitutional Convention is expected to
determine the fate of the petition to end same-sex marriage in
Massachusetts, which became the only state in the nation to sanction
gay marriages after a Supreme Judicial Court decision in 2003. The
petition would die if no vote is taken on the proposal in this
legislative session.
Gay rights activists said that Murray's statement yesterday is
consistent with their current strategy, which is to defeat the
amendment outright, rather than resorting to legislative maneuvers.
"Our goal is to win this on the merits of the issue," said Arline
Isaacson, cochairwoman of the Massachusetts Gay and Lesbian Political
Caucus. "We would love to defeat this mean-spirited amendment by
denying them the 50 votes they need, and we are working very hard to do
just that."
This new strategy reflects the reality that gay rights leaders can no
longer muster the majority of legislators needed to block a vote on the
measure.
In November, Murray voted with same-sex marriage proponents to delay
the Constitutional Convention until Jan. 2, when they hoped to run out
the clock and defeat the petition with parliamentary tactics, rather
than a direct vote. But in January, after the Supreme Judicial Court
ruled that the Massachusetts Constitution requires lawmakers to vote on
citizen-sponsored petitions, many gay marriage supporters in the
Legislature backed away from any move to prevent a vote.
Kris Mineau -- president of the Massachusetts Family Institute -- which
led the petition drive to put the amendment on the ballot, said he
found Murray's comments encouraging. He said her statement reflects a
realization that her role as Senate president requires her to be
even-handed and to make sure a vote is taken on the issue.
"We did not know where she would stand, until she made this
[statement]," Mineau said. "I feel she is really stepping up to her
total responsibilities as president of the Senate and not just to her
own constituents, recognizing that she bears the responsibility that
requirements of the constitution are met."
No date has been set for the next Constitutional Convention. Lawmakers
who are working to defeat the amendment say that the convention, a
joint session of the House and Senate, will convene when they are
confident they have the votes to defeat it. As Senate president, Murray
has the authority to convene the session.
Advocates of gay marriage say Murray's election as Senate president
gives them a decided advantage as they work to win over eight of the 57
current lawmakers who support the proposed amendment. Her ability to
control much of the convention's agenda, including when it is convened
and the flow of debate, will give them a strong advantage.
Gay activists and their supporters also point out that now, for the
first time, they can rely on Governor Deval Patrick, Murray, and House
Speaker Salvatore F. DiMasi. Until this year, they had only DiMasi's
support. All three are working with them to lobby opponents in the
Legislature to change their votes.
Marc Solomon -- campaign director of MassEquality, the political arm of
the gay marriage forces -- said his organization is working on a pool
of more than 20 legislators who the group feels could potentially
switch position.
"We continue to show that, electorally, this is the smart vote, not the risky one," Solomon said.
MassEquality has 13 field organizers working around the state,
targeting legislative districts that the group feels could yield the
votes to defeat the measure.
But champions of the amendment, while recognizing they are facing a
strong lobbying effort from united leadership on Beacon Hill, say they
are confident that they are holding their ground.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhode Island to recognize gay marriages done in Massachusetts
|
 |
By Associated Press
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
PROVIDENCE,
R.I. - The state of Rhode Island should recognize the gay marriages of
state employees performed in Massachusetts and extend the same
benefits, Attorney General Patrick Lynch said in a letter to a state
department.
”Rhode
Island will recognize same sex marriages lawfully performed in
Massachusetts as marriages in Rhode Island,” Lynch said in a letter
dated Tuesday and released Wednesday.
He
said Rhode Island prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation
and also extends benefits such as health insurance to domestic partners
of state employees. He said that with the absence of a law banning gay
marriage, there’s no strong reason to deny recognition to gay marriages
performed in Massachusetts, the only state where such unions are legal.
Michael
Healey, a spokesman for Lynch, said the opinion was not binding, but
Michele Granda, a staff attorney for Gay & Lesbian Advocates &
Defenders, said she expected most government agencies in Rhode Island
to heed the legal advice of the state’s top lawyer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marriage Amendment Passes
|
| |
The next few weeks and months will be important for Massachusetts' gay and lesbian individuals, couples and families. With a minority of the Massachusetts legislature acting carelessly, the anti-gay, anti-family Marriage Amendment is one step closer to allowing civil rights to be put up for a public majority vote.
While we can not change past events, we can look to the future. With a new, progressive governor, and thousands of people working locally to speak with their legislators and senators, all hope of equal rights have not been lost. The oldest constitution in the world will not be tainted with discriminatory measures. Not now, not ever.
We've got a lot of hard work ahead of us, and this is where your action and energy really counts. We need to sway 11 or so legislators to change their votes, and while not easy, it's not impossible. Get out there and make change happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ford pulls ads from gay media, caves to pressure from right-wing groups
|
| |
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) - Ford Motor Co. faced sharp criticism from gay and lesbian advocacy groups for agreeing to stop advertising in gay-themed publications in the face of a boycott by the conservative American Family Association, according to a report Tuesday.
The AFA launched a boycott of Ford (Research) in May to protest marketing aimed at gay and lesbian consumers, the Detroit News said. The automaker responded by promising that most of its brands, with the exception of Sweden-based Volvo, will no longer target gay consumers through advertising.
After Ford's concession, gay and lesbian organizations argued that the automaker caved in to pressure from the religious right, the paper said.
"We are deeply dismayed that Ford has entered into a confidential agreement with the extremist American Family Association that requires Ford to stop advertising in lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender media," a group of 17 gay and lesbian organizations said in a joint statement, according to the paper.
"If there is an agreement with AFA, we expect Ford to disavow it. We expect Ford to publicly reaffirm its historic support for our community. And, we expect Ford to meet with LGBT representatives this week to resolve these concerns."
Ford said that it could market its products in a manner that was just as effective without offending consumers, according to the report.
"We reserve the right to advertise our brands and products wherever we think it makes business sense," Ojakli and Leitch wrote in a letter Monday to Suzanne Wait, head of Ford's gay and lesbian employee group, according to the paper.
Ford said its nondiscrimination policies covering employees, regardless of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation and cultural and physical differences, will not change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALERT!!!
As some of you may know, there has been a lot of deception revolving around signature collection by opponents of gay marriage who are trying to put the equal marriage question on the ballot in 2008.
Most of this has been happening around supermarkets such as Stop & Shop and Market Basket, where a person will ask you to sign the petition to get the state to allow food stores to sell alcohol. Once they get you to sign this petition, they ask you to sign another, often misleading you to think it's the same thing, and never revealing what the true petition is.
However, this fraud is now occuring elsewhere.
A friend of mine went to a Target store where she was approached by an unassuming female in her twenties. She asked if my friend would sign a petition to get clubs in the area to stay open later. She then asked my friend to sign another petition, which the girl claimed was because she needed to have two sheets of signatures in case one got damaged. This, however, was not the reason. The real reason she asked my friend to sign the second petition was because it was "Petition K", the Equal Marriage Amendment petition. My friend was not aware that the illegal signature collecting had been occuring. Since then, she has been informed of the events taking place elsewhere, and is sure that fraud took place in this case as well.
We are asking that you remain viligiant when someone approaches you or is approaching others to sign petions around any kind of store. The state is holding hearings on the known abuses against signature collecting. If you have been a victim and think you have also been tricked into signing a petition not knowing what it really was, please take action. It is the only was we can stop this disgusting and illegal practice from taking place.
If you think you have inadvertently signed the marriage petition, you do have a way to fix it. Write a letter explaining the situation with as much detail to the events as they occurred as possible. In your letter, please refer to the anti-gay marriage petition as "Petition K".
Mail your letter to your city or town's local registrar of voters (every city and town in Massachusetts has one), and send copies to:
The Honorable William Galvin
Secretary of State
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
1 Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108
Attention: Elections Division
Nicholas Paras
Civil Investigator
Office of Attorney General Tom Reilly
1 Ashburton Place
Boston, MA 02108
Additionally, if the deception happened outside a grocery store, please send a copy to:
Christopher P. Flynn
President
Massachusetts Food Association
31 Milk Street, Suite 518
Boston, MA 02109
If you would like further information on these occurances, please go to the MassEquality page to find out more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marriage ban kicked down, but not out
|
| |
September 14, 2005
The legislature of Massachusetts voted against a ban on gay marriage, paving the way for commited couples across the Commonwealth to continue to share equal rights with the rest of their fellow citizens. Although the rallies weren't as large as last year and the media coverage wasn't as intense, this was still an important issue in the lives of thousands of people in Massachusetts and around the globe.
This recent victory is uplifting and encouraging. However, even with all the celebration, there is yet another fear looming over the shoulders of those affected by this decision. Due to the overwhelming response of those state Representatives who reversed their vote in favor of gay marriage this year, one must stop and realize not all of them did this for the families and citizens of Massachusetts. A new strategy is about to take off on the anti-gay front.
Members of "pro-family", anti-american groups such as the Massachusetts Family Institute have planned to launch a petition campaign to stop families from doing what they do best: love.
Members need to collect about 66,000 signatures and it could go before voters on the 2008 ballot if passed in the next two legislaive sessions. Only 25 percent, or 51, votes would be needed to pass it, as opposed to a majority vote.
As we all know however, the people of Massachusetts are fair-minded and caring folk, so even if this petition drive to ban same-sex marriage does make it to the ballot in 2008, it would be a hard sell. The majority of people who accept same-sex marriage far outweigh the minority that feel threatened by it.
While we wait the years it will take to get their petition drive rolling, thousands of more couples will become enganged and married in Massachusetts. The sun will continue to rise, as Senator Jarret Barrios has said. The society in the Northeast will not crumble and Massachusetts will continue to have the lowest divorce rate in the country.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada 4th nation to legalize gay marriage
By Rob Gillies, Associated Press Writer | July 20, 2005
TORONTO --Canada legalized gay marriage Wednesday, becoming the world's fourth nation to grant full legal rights to same-sex couples.
Supreme Court Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin signed the legislation making it law, hours after it was approved by the Senate late Tuesday night despite strong opposition from Conservatives and religious leaders.
The bill gives homosexual couples the same rights as those in traditional unions between a man and a woman, something already legal in eight of Canada's 10 provinces and in two of its three territories.
The legislation drafted by Prime Minister Paul Martin's minority Liberal Party government easily passed the Senate, which essentially rubber stamps any bill already passed by the House of Commons, which passed it late last month.
The Netherlands, Belgium and Spain are the only other nations that allow gay marriage nationwide.
The law comes after years of court battles and debate that divided families, religious groups and even political allies. The Roman Catholic Church, the predominant Christian denomination in Canada, has vigorously opposed the legislation.
But Martin, a Roman Catholic, has said that despite anyone's personal beliefs, all Canadians should be granted the same rights to marriage.
Alex Munter, national spokesman for Canadians for Equal Marriage, which has led the debate in favor of the law, was triumphant Wednesday: "It is a signal to the world that Canada is an open and inclusive society that believes in the notion of full citizenship for all."
Churches have expressed concern that their clergy would be compelled to perform same sex ceremonies. The legislation, however, states that the bill only covers civil unions, not religious ones, and no clergy would be forced to perform same-sex ceremonies unless they choose to do so.
Charles McVety, a spokesman for Defend Marriage Canada and president of Canada Christian College, said he was "very sad that the state has invaded the church, breached separation of church and state and redefined a religious word."
McVety vowed his group would work to vote out lawmakers who supported the legislation in the next general elections.
"A new Parliament is going to readdress this issue and common sense ultimately will prevail," McVety said.
In the United States, Massachusetts is the only state that allows gay marriages; Vermont and Connecticut have approved same-sex civil unions.
Though hundreds of foreigners have come to Canada to seek civil ceremonies since gay marriages were first allowed in Ontario and British Columbia in 2003, not all countries or states recognize the unions.
The U.S. government does not recognize same-sex marriage, and most states refuse to acknowledge marriage certificates from gay and lesbian couples, regardless of where they wed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Romney to Back Plan to Ban Gay Marriage
BOSTON Jun 16, 2005 Gov. Mitt Romney said Thursday he will support a proposed constitutional amendment banning gay marriage in Massachusetts, the only state where it is legal.
The Legislature was already working on a proposed amendment that would ban gay marriage but also would allow Vermont-style civil unions. The new proposal drops the civil union language, meaning such unions would remain illegal in the state.
If the new proposal passesprocedural hurdles, it could appear on the statewide ballot as soon as November 2008.
Romney said the original proposed amendment which was narrowly passed last year by state lawmakers and is awaiting a second round of voting later this year is "muddied" because it includes both the gay marriage and civil union issues. He said voters should be able to decide on gay marriage with a "clean, straightforward, unambiguous amendment" that does not include civil unions.
"I believe it's superior to the amendment which is currently pending before the state Legislature, and hope that this amendment will ultimately be the one which the citizens have the opportunity to vote upon," Romney said.
The announcement was immediately decried by supporters of gay marriage.
"I think the amendment is an extreme and mean-spirited effort to take away marriage equality and replace it with nothing," said Mark Solomon, political director of MassEquality. "It is really sad that (Romney) is playing politics with gay and lesbian families and their children, and that's all that is."
The new proposed amendment will take the form of a citizen's initiative. That means the state attorney general's office must sign off on the proposal language, supporters must collect 65,825 voters' signatures and one-quarter of lawmakers in the Legislature must vote twice to approve it. Only if it passes those hurdles would the state's voters have their say.
Boston Archbishop Sean O'Malley and the bishops of the state's other three Roman Catholic dioceses pledged support for signature-gathering efforts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Court Rejects Bid To Halt Same-Sex Marriages
May 27, 2005
BOSTON (AP) -- The state's highest court on Friday rejected a Roman Catholic activist's bid to halt gay marriages in Massachusetts until after voters have weighed in on a constitutional ban.
The Supreme Judicial Court authorized the nation's first same-sex weddings with its landmark November 2003 ruling. C. Joseph Doyle, executive director of the Catholic Action League, had argued that the ruling went too far by allowing gay marriages to proceed before voters had a chance to consider the constitutional amendment.
Doyle's lawsuit sought a stay on gay marriages until after the vote, which could happen in November 2006, at the earliest, but the high court rejected his request.
In March 2004, two months before the SJC's gay marriage ruling took effect, lawmakers gave their initial approval to a constitutional ban that would simultaneously legalize Vermont-style civil unions. They must pass it a second time during the current legislative session before it can reach the statewide ballot.
Doyle had appealed to the full court after a single justice dismissed his claim last year. Justice Roderick Ireland said same-sex couples shouldn't be denied the right to marry based on the possibility that voters would approve the amendment.
"The single justice was correct and well within his discretion" in denying Doyle's request, the high court wrote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top Psychiatric Group Urges Making Gay Marriage Legal
Reported in the Washington Post, Monday, May 23, 2005 ATLANTA-- Representatives of the nation's top psychiatric group approved a statement Sunday urging legal recognition of same-sex marriage.
If approved by the association's directors in July, the measure would make the American Psychiatric Association the first major medical group to take such a stance.
The statement supports same-sex marriage "in the interest of maintaining and promoting mental health."
It follows a similar measure by the American Psychological Association last year, little more than three decades after that group removed homosexuality from its list of mental disorders.
The psychiatric association's statement was approved by voice vote on the first day of its weeklong annual meeting in Atlanta. It cites the "positive influence of a stable, adult partnership on the health of all family members."
The resolution recognizes "that gay men and lesbians are full human beings who should be afforded the same human and civil rights," said Margery Sved, a Raleigh, N.C., psychiatrist and member of the assembly's committee on gay and lesbian issues.
The document states that the association is addressing same-sex civil marriage, not religious marriages. It takes no position on any religion's views on marriage.
Massachusetts is the only state that allows same-sex marriage. Eighteen states have passed constitutional amendments outlawing same-sex marriage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stop & Shop, Shaw's and Star Market continue distribution of Bay Windows!
Thanks to your efforts and those of the Bay Windows' staff, Stop & Shop, Shaw's and Star Market are again distributing Bay Windows!
Stop & Shop and Shaws/Star Markets, the two largest supermarket chains in New England, had both announced that they would no longer carry the Bay Windows newspaper (New England's Largest gay and lesbian newspaper) in its stores, and they had removed all copies from their shelves.ÃÂ Stop & Shop added that the decision was made in conjunction with its legal department.
Both chains received calls and emails from all over Massachusetts because of the extreme right wing anti-gay hate group Article 8 Alliance based out of Waltham, Mass.
However, because of your e-mails to the companies and the hard work of the Bay WIndows staff, we have reversed both supermarket chains' decisions and they are again providing the GLBT community with access to New England's largest gay and lesbian newspaper.
Call and/or E-mail both supermarkets to thank them for continuing distribution of Bay Windows.
Stop & Shop feedback form: CLICK HERE TO CONTACT STOP & SHOP!
Shaw's feedback form: CLICK HERE TO CONTACT SHAW'S / STAR MARKET
Stop & Shop: Mr. Marc Smith, CEO Stop & Shop Supermarket Cos. P.O. Box 55888 Boston, MAÃÂ 02205 617-770-8735
Shaws/Star Market: Mrs. Nicola DeFelice, President Shaw's Supermarkets P.O. Box 600 E Bridgewater, MA 02333 508-378-3020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
